feat(skills,pipelines): ask the user at the two points being wrong is cheap, and stop paying for reviews the diff does not need
The `default` 8-node pipeline walked past its own intake: the node declared `agenthub stage intake`, a stage report with no work attached, so "intake" was a label the run passed through without ever asking a question. It now declares `/superpowers:brainstorming` (and detects it — that rule moves off `plan`), and both driving skills make the brainstorm mandatory, asked with AskUserQuestion and waited on rather than answered on the user's behalf. Three stops replace three silent slides: - After the plan is written and adversarially challenged, it goes to the USER for approval. Implementation does not start without it, and work that turns out to need a different approach comes back for a fresh one. - Review picks its reviewers from `git diff --name-only`: Claude Code's own `code-review` always, a domain reviewer only for a layer the diff actually touched, and — new — only once the change is big enough to have seams. Three agents re-reading twenty lines buys one opinion at three times the tokens, on every fix-loop lap. Review is also a loop now: it ends on a clean pass over the current diff, not on one pass having happened. - The gate asks the user to accept before anything is claimed done (and in the lane pipeline, before the PR is published — publishing is outward-facing). A NO-GO re-enters by SIZE: a defect goes back to implement, a wrong approach back to plan. Nothing carries a NO-GO forward with a note about it. Also here, from a real stall seen on a lane: `ship-feature` had no waiting rule at all, and a session at the gate invented one with `ScheduleWakeup` — a /loop-only primitive that paces nothing here and is refused outright when `auto` mode cannot reach its safety classifier. The rule the lane skill already had now exists in both. Cost, measured in what each agent is actually for: the suite run leaves its agent (nothing is judged, so nothing is delegated — an agent there buys a second model's tokens to read output the session can read for free), and `backend-reviewer` drops from opus to sonnet like its frontend twin; both read a scoped diff against a fixed checklist, and the senior gate above them is still opus. Skill bugs found in the same sweep: doc-map told agents not to recreate the removed translations and then, three lines later, to mirror every README change into them; the docs mapping still carried `+VN+CN` and the punctuation left by their removal; Procedure jumped 2 → 6; Verify required `scripts/doc-coverage.sh`, which does not exist in this repo.
This commit is contained in:
+2
-2
@@ -1123,8 +1123,8 @@ a `detect` array on each node. The built-in `default.json`
|
||||
|
||||
| Node | Detect rules |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| `intake` | `Agent` matching subagent `Explore` — a lane sitting at nothing else yet, but already exploring, shows *something* instead of idle |
|
||||
| `plan` | `Skill` matching `brainstorming\|writing-plans`; `Write` matching `docs/.*plan.*\.md`; `Agent` matching `Plan\|Software Architect\|Backend Architect\|UX Architect`; `TaskCreate` (any) |
|
||||
| `intake` | `Agent` matching subagent `Explore` — a lane sitting at nothing else yet, but already exploring, shows *something* instead of idle; `Skill` matching `brainstorming`, which is intake's own declared command |
|
||||
| `plan` | `Skill` matching `writing-plans`; `Write` matching `docs/.*plan.*\.md`; `Agent` matching `Plan\|Software Architect\|Backend Architect\|UX Architect`; `TaskCreate` (any) |
|
||||
| `implement` | `Skill` matching `executing-plans\|subagent-driven-development\|test-driven-development`; `Edit` (any); `Write` to any path NOT under a `docs/` directory (`^(?!.*(?:^\|/)docs/)`) |
|
||||
| `tests` | `Bash` matching `\b(npm (run )?test\|pytest\|vitest\|jest\|go test\|cargo test\|node\s+--test\|rspec\|phpunit\|dotnet test\|mvn test\|gradle test)\b`; `Agent` matching `Test Results Analyzer\|API Tester\|Performance Benchmarker` |
|
||||
| `review` | `Skill` matching `code-review\|requesting-code-review\|receiving-code-review`; `Bash` matching `\bgh\b[^;&\|]*\bpr diff\b`; `Agent` matching a name containing `reviewer`/`Reviewer` (excluding `senior-gate-reviewer`, a lookbehind), `Evidence Collector`, or `Accessibility Auditor` |
|
||||
|
||||
+2
-2
@@ -212,8 +212,8 @@ any of them is ever deleted:
|
||||
| The directory `agenthub.service` names (`unitRoot`, **foreign unit included**) | A service is executing from it. Not ours to rewrite is still not ours to delete. |
|
||||
| Any directory named in the user's `settings.json` hooks | A Claude Code process that has not been restarted is still executing from there — this is the same directory the section above describes, seen from the other side. Deleting it would break that session's hooks mid-flight. |
|
||||
|
||||
Plus the newest `KEEP_RETIRED_ROOTS` (2) of whatever is left, as a rollback
|
||||
cushion. Outside `~/.claude/plugins/cache/` the pruner does nothing at all — for
|
||||
Plus the newest `KEEP_RETIRED_ROOTS` (1) of whatever is left, as a rollback
|
||||
cushion — one build deep, because a full copy of this repo is ~130 MB. Outside `~/.claude/plugins/cache/` the pruner does nothing at all — for
|
||||
a git checkout the parent directory holds the user's own work. Best effort
|
||||
throughout: a directory that will not delete is left alone, never an error.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user