docs: snapshot of the project's Claude Code memory

Decisions, environment quirks and pitfalls learned while working on AgentHub
(docs/claude-memory/, indexed by MEMORY.md). Notes holding personal account
details are left out.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-10-13 15:27:35 +07:00
parent d72a255294
commit 9c573f1e3c
28 changed files with 721 additions and 0 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
---
name: no-agenthub-agents-skills
description: "Do not use agenthub:* agents or agenthub:* skills (ship-feature, reviewers, update-project-docs…) — too quota-heavy"
metadata:
node_type: memory
type: feedback
originSessionId: 7d8f0767-2ebe-4082-af4a-bb47a9104695
modified: 2026-09-24T04:39:18.244Z
---
Do not dispatch `agenthub:*` agents (frontend-reviewer, backend-reviewer, qc-local, senior-gate-reviewer) or invoke `agenthub:*` skills (ship-feature, ship-feature-lane, update-project-docs, …), even where CLAUDE.md says to prefer them.
**Why:** the user said (2026-09-24) they cost too much quota for what they deliver.
**How to apply:** do the review, docs and pipeline steps directly. A single non-agenthub reviewer is OK only when it's clearly worth it. The `agenthub stage` CLI calls are cheap reporting, and those are still fine.