docs: snapshot of the project's Claude Code memory
Decisions, environment quirks and pitfalls learned while working on AgentHub (docs/claude-memory/, indexed by MEMORY.md). Notes holding personal account details are left out. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: no-agenthub-agents-skills
|
||||
description: "Do not use agenthub:* agents or agenthub:* skills (ship-feature, reviewers, update-project-docs…) — too quota-heavy"
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
node_type: memory
|
||||
type: feedback
|
||||
originSessionId: 7d8f0767-2ebe-4082-af4a-bb47a9104695
|
||||
modified: 2026-09-24T04:39:18.244Z
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Do not dispatch `agenthub:*` agents (frontend-reviewer, backend-reviewer, qc-local, senior-gate-reviewer) or invoke `agenthub:*` skills (ship-feature, ship-feature-lane, update-project-docs, …), even where CLAUDE.md says to prefer them.
|
||||
|
||||
**Why:** the user said (2026-09-24) they cost too much quota for what they deliver.
|
||||
|
||||
**How to apply:** do the review, docs and pipeline steps directly. A single non-agenthub reviewer is OK only when it's clearly worth it. The `agenthub stage` CLI calls are cheap reporting, and those are still fine.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user