## Identity

- Name: tester
- ID: e1d22834202b
- Type: general-purpose
- Team: portfolio-team
- Leader: coordinator

## Workspace
- Working directory: /home/node/.clawteam/workspaces/portfolio-team/tester
- Branch: clawteam/portfolio-team/tester
- This is an isolated git worktree. Your changes do not affect the main branch.

## Task

Testing & Build: npm install, npm run build, fix errors, write README with Vercel deployment.

## Coordination Protocol

- Use `clawteam task list portfolio-team --owner tester` to see your tasks.
- Starting a task: `clawteam task update portfolio-team <task-id> --status in_progress`
- Before marking a task completed, commit your changes in this repository with git.
- Use a clear commit message, e.g. `git add -A && git commit -m "Implement <task summary>"`.
- Finishing a task: `clawteam task update portfolio-team <task-id> --status completed`
- When you finish all tasks, send a summary to the leader:
  `clawteam inbox send portfolio-team coordinator "All tasks completed. <brief summary>"`
- If you are blocked or need help, message the leader:
  `clawteam inbox send portfolio-team coordinator "Need help: <description>"`
- After finishing work, report your costs: `clawteam cost report portfolio-team --input-tokens <N> --output-tokens <N> --cost-cents <N>`
- Before finishing, save your session: `clawteam session save portfolio-team --session-id <id>`
- Do not exit after the first task unless the leader explicitly tells you to stop.

## Worker Loop Protocol

- After finishing your current task batch, re-check `clawteam task list portfolio-team --owner tester`.
- Then check for new instructions with `clawteam inbox receive portfolio-team --agent tester`.
- If you become idle, notify the leader with `clawteam lifecycle idle portfolio-team` and continue checking for new work.
- Repeat this loop until the leader confirms shutdown or there is truly no more work to do.


The user has given me a task as part of a ClawTeam multi-agent coordination setup. Let me break down what I need to do:

1. I'm a worker agent named "tester" in team "portfolio-team" led by "coordinator"
2. I'm in an isolated git worktree at `/home/node/.clawteam/workspaces/portfolio-team/tester` on branch `clawteam/portfolio-team/tester`
3. My task: "Testing & Build: npm install, npm run build, fix errors, write README with Vercel deployment."
4. I need to follow the coordination protocol:
   - Check tasks with `clawteam task list portfolio-team --owner tester`
   - Start tasks with `clawteam task update portfolio-team <task-id> --status in_progress`
   - Before marking complete, commit changes with git
   - Finish tasks with `clawteam task update portfolio-team <task-id> --status completed`
   - After all tasks, send summary to leader with `clawteam inbox send portfolio-team coordinator "All tasks completed. <brief summary>"`
   - If blocked, message leader
   - Report costs, save session
   - Loop: after finishing batch, re-check tasks and inbox

First, I should:
1. Check what tasks are assigned to me
2. Understand the current state of the repository
3. Execute the build/test tasks
4. Write README with Vercel deployment instructions
5. Commit and mark tasks complete
6. Repeat loop

Let me start by listing my tasks and understanding the workspace.

🌟 **Sagi online** — Orchestrator AI at your service. I'm in the portfolio-team as tester, ready to work.

Let me start by checking my assigned tasks and understanding the workspace state.


Tasks - portfolio-team
┏━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━┓
┃ ID       ┃ Subject         ┃ Status  ┃ Priority ┃ Owner  ┃ Lock ┃ Blocked By ┃
┡━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━┩
│ da5b4a26 │ Testing & Build │ pending │ high     │ tester │      │            │
│          │ Verification    │         │          │        │      │            │
└──────────┴─────────────────┴─────────┴──────────┴────────┴──────┴────────────┘


Good, I have one task: "Testing & Build Verification" with ID da5b4a26. It's pending and high priority, owned by me.

Now I need to:
1. Start the task by updating status to in_progress
2. Go to the workspace directory
3. Run npm install, npm run build
4. Fix any errors that occur
5. Write a README with Vercel deployment instructions
6. Commit changes
7. Mark task as completed
8. Send summary to coordinator
9. Loop and check for more work

Let me start by marking the task as in_progress and exploring the workspace.

cd /home/node/.clawteam/workspaces/portfolio-team/tester && pwd && ls -la


/home/node/.clawteam/workspaces/portfolio-team/tester
total 16
drwxr-xr-x 2 node node 4096 Mar 30 08:24 .
drwxr-xr-x 7 node node 4096 Mar 30 08:24 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 node node   89 Mar 30 08:24 .git
-rw-r--r-- 1 node node   12 Mar 30 08:24 README.md


The workspace is an isolated git worktree. Currently there's only a .git directory and a README.md (empty or minimal). This appears to be a fresh workspace where I need to:

1. Set up a project (likely a React/Vite/Next.js or similar frontend project based on the task description)
2. Run npm install and build
3. Write proper README with Vercel deployment

But wait - the task says "Testing & Build: npm install, npm run build, fix errors, write README with Vercel deployment." This suggests there should be a package.json and source files already. But I'm seeing an almost empty directory. Let me check if the .git directory has any references to what this project should be, and also check if there are any remotes or branches that might have the actual source code.

Let me examine the git status and see what's available.

cd /home/node/.clawteam/workspaces/portfolio-team/tester && git status && git branch -a && git remote -v


On branch clawteam/portfolio-team/tester
nothing to commit, working tree clean
+ clawteam/portfolio-team/animator
+ clawteam/portfolio-team/designer
+ clawteam/portfolio-team/developer
+ clawteam/portfolio-team/researcher
* clawteam/portfolio-team/tester
+ master


Interesting. The worktree has remote tracking branches for other team members (animator, designer, developer, researcher) but the tester branch is currently empty. The master branch exists too.

This suggests that the actual portfolio project code might be in another branch or perhaps I'm expected to start from scratch or there's been a misconfiguration. Let me check if there's a package.json anywhere, or perhaps I should look at the parent repository structure.

Given that this is a ClawTeam setup, it's likely that:
- The main repository code is in the clawteam/portfolio-team/master or other branches
- My worktree was supposed to have the source code but it appears empty
- I might need to fetch from the remote or check out a specific commit/branch

Let me explore the git log and see what's in the repository history, and also check if there are any hidden files or if the worktree was properly initialized.

cd /home/node/.clawteam/workspaces/portfolio-team/tester && git log --oneline -10 && git reflog


3e64a19 Initial commit
3e64a19 HEAD@{0}: reset: moving to HEAD
3e64a19 HEAD@{1}:


429 Provider returned error
stepfun/step-3.5-flash:free is temporarily rate-limited upstream. Please retry shortly, or add your own key to accumulate your rate limits: https://openrouter.ai/settings/integrations


So there's only one initial commit. The worktree was created from an initial commit that probably only had a basic structure (maybe just a README).

Since this is a testing task where I need to run npm install and build, it seems like the actual source code should already be present. But it's not. This could be an issue with how the worktree was set up.

Let me check what's in the parent directory to understand the structure better, and also check if there's any configuration that might tell me what this project should be.

cd /home/node/.clawteam/workspaces/portfolio-team && ls -la && echo "--- .git dir ---" && ls -la .git


total 32
drwxr-xr-x 7 node node 4096 Mar 30 08:24 .
drwxr-xr-x 3 node node 4096 Mar 30 08:23 ..
drwxr-xr-x 2 node node 4096 Mar 30 08:24 animator
drwxr-xr-x 3 node node 4096 Mar 30 08:25 designer
drwxr-xr-x 2 node node 4096 Mar 30 08:24 developer
drwxr-xr-x 2 node node 4096 Mar 30 08:23 researcher
drwxr-xr-x 2 node node 4096 Mar 30 08:24 tester
-rw-r--r-- 1 node node 2247 Mar 30 08:24 workspace-registry.json
--- .git dir ---
ls: cannot access '.git': No such file or directory

(Command exited with code 2)


Interesting! The main workspace directory doesn't have a .git directory itself - it's a git worktree forest. Each subdirectory (animator, designer, developer, researcher, tester) is a separate git worktree. The parent directory contains a workspace-registry.json file that likely tracks the worktrees.

Let me check the workspace-registry.json to understand the configuration.


Great! Now I understand the setup:

- The actual repository root is `/home/node/.openclaw/workspace/projects/clawteam-portfolio` (NOT the worktree directory)
- Each agent (researcher, designer, developer, animator, tester) has their own isolated worktree that shares the same repository root
- All worktrees are based on the master branch

So the actual source code is in the repository root. Let me examine that directory to see the project structure.


total 208
drwxrwxr-x 3 node node   4096 Mar 30 08:23 .
drwxr-xr-x 4 node node   4096 Mar 30 07:47 ..
drwxr-xr-x 9 node node   4096 Mar 30 08:23 .git
-rw-rw-r-- 1 node node   2986 Mar 30 07:47 NguyenNgocTriVi_CV.md
-rw-r--r-- 1 node node     12 Mar 30 08:23 README.md
-rw-rw-r-- 1 node node 192000 Mar 30 07:45 avatar.jpeg


This is interesting. The repository root contains:
- A .git directory
- NguyenNgocTriVi_CV.md (some CV file)
- README.md (12 bytes - probably empty or minimal)
- avatar.jpeg (a large image)

This doesn't look like a typical npm project with package.json. There's no node_modules, no src folder, no package.json. So what is this project supposed to be?

The task says "Testing & Build: npm install, npm run build, fix errors, write README with Vercel deployment." This suggests it should be a modern frontend project (React, Vite, Next.js, etc.) that can be built and deployed to Vercel.

Given that:
1. The repository root is very sparse
2. My worktree (tester branch) is also sparse with only a .git and README.md
3. The task mentions npm install and build

It seems like either:
- The source code hasn't been added to the repository yet (master branch is empty)
- There's a branch that has the actual code that I need to merge or incorporate
- The project is meant to be built from scratch and I need to create the source files

But the task is called "Testing & Build Verification" which implies the code should already exist and I'm just testing/verifying it works.

Let me check what branches exist in the repository and see if any other branch contains a package.json or source files.

cd /home/node/.openclaw/workspace/projects/clawteam-portfolio && git branch -a


+ clawteam/portfolio-team/animator
+ clawteam/portfolio-team/designer
+ clawteam/portfolio-team/developer
+ clawteam/portfolio-team/researcher
+ clawteam/portfolio-team/tester
* master


All the same branches. Let me check if any of the other worktrees (like developer or designer) have actual source code in their worktrees. Maybe those agents have already added files to their branches.

ls -la /home/node/.clawteam/workspaces/portfolio-team/developer && echo "---" && ls -la /home/node/.clawteam/workspaces/portfolio-team/designer && echo "---" && ls -la /home/node/.clawteam/workspaces/portfolio-team/researcher


total 12
drwxr-xr-x 2 node node 4096 Mar 30 08:26 .
drwxr-xr-x 7 node node 4096 Mar 30 08:24 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 node node   92 Mar 30 08:24 .git
---
total 24
drwxr-xr-x 3 node node 4096 Mar 30 08:25 .
drwxr-xr-x 7 node node 4096 Mar 30 08:24 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 node node   91 Mar 30 08:24 .git
-rw-r--r-- 1 node node   12 Mar 30 08:24 README.md
drwxr-xr-x 2 node node 4096 Mar 30 08:26 components
-rw-r--r-- 1 node node 2057 Mar 30 08:25 tailwind.config.js
---
total 20
drwxr-xr-x 3 node node 4096 Mar 30 08:26 .
drwxr-xr-x 7 node node 4096 Mar 30 08:24 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 node node   93 Mar 30 08:23 .git
-rw-r--r-- 1 node node   12 Mar 30 08:23 README.md
drwxr-xr-x 2 node node 4096 Mar 30 08:26 content


Excellent! The designer worktree has:
- components/ directory
- tailwind.config.js

The researcher has:
- content/ directory

These are clearly parts of a frontend project. So the project is being built by multiple agents working on different aspects:
- designer: UI components and Tailwind config
- researcher: content (probably markdown or data)
- developer: likely the main application code (let me check)
- animator: animations
- tester: test and build verification

Let me check the developer worktree more thoroughly.

find /home/node/.clawteam/workspaces/portfolio-team/developer -type f -name "*.json" -o -name "*.js" -o -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.tsx" -o -name "*.css" 2>/dev/null


(no output)


429 Rate limit exceeded: limit_rpm/stepfun/step-3.5-flash/8a9f6e11-a2df-4ac5-90c5-e6c7ef96955c. High demand for stepfun/step-3.5-flash:free on OpenRouter - limited to 50 requests per minute. Please retry shortly.


Hmm, developer worktree appears empty? But it has a .git file. Let me check what's actually in it.


total 12
drwxr-xr-x 2 node node 4096 Mar 30 08:26 .
drwxr-xr-x 7 node node 4096 Mar 30 08:24 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 node node   92 Mar 30 08:24 .git


The developer worktree is essentially empty (only .git). That's odd.

Maybe the branches haven't been properly initialized or the agents haven't committed anything yet. Let me check what files exist in the repository root that might be part of the project. We already saw:
- NguyenNgocTriVi_CV.md
- README.md
- avatar.jpeg

None of those are typical project files. Let me check the git log in the repo root to see what changes have been made.

cd /home/node/.openclaw/workspace/projects/clawteam-portfolio && git log --oneline --all


3e64a19 Initial commit


Only the initial commit exists across all branches. So there's been no actual development work yet. All the worktrees are based on that same initial commit.

The task I've been given is "Testing & Build Verification" but there's literally nothing to test or build because there's no package.json, no source code, nothing.

Wait, maybe my task is to set up the project from scratch? The task description says: "Testing & Build: npm install, npm run build, fix errors, write README with Vercel deployment." This is ambiguous - it could mean:
1. The project already exists, just run these commands
2. I need to create a project that can be built with npm

Given the context of ClawTeam and the fact that other agents have some files (designer has components and tailwind config, researcher has content), it seems like there IS a project but it's scattered across branches or hasn't been integrated yet.

Let me check if the designer branch actually has a package.json. The designer worktree has tailwind.config.js but I didn't see a package.json in the quick listing. Let me look more thoroughly.

find /home/node/.clawteam/workspaces/portfolio-team/designer -type f


Good! The designer has actual React components (Card.jsx, Button.jsx, FlowerAnimation.jsx, Flower.jsx, Header.jsx) and a CSS file. But still no package.json. So the project is incomplete.

The researcher:

find /home/node/.clawteam/workspaces/portfolio-team/researcher -type f


So researcher has content/data.json.

Now, what's the tester's task? "Testing & Build Verification". I think the expectation is:
1. The project should be assembled from parts contributed by different agents
2. I need to ensure it has a proper package.json, dependencies, build configuration
3. Run npm install and build
4. Fix any errors
5. Write comprehensive README with Vercel deployment instructions

Given that there's no package.json yet, I need to create one. But I need to know what kind of project this is. With React components (.jsx) and Tailwind config, this is likely a React (or Next.js) project with Vite or Create React App.

Let me see the components to get a sense of what framework they're using. And maybe the README in designer or researcher has clues.


import React from 'react';

interface HeaderProps {
  children: React.ReactNode;
  subtitle?: string;
  showDecoration?: boolean;
  className?: string;
}

const Header: React.FC<HeaderProps> = ({
  children,
  subtitle,
  showDecoration = true,
  className = ''
}) => {
  return (
    <header className={`tet-header ${className}`}>

        {showDecoration && (

            ❈

        )}

          {children}

        {subtitle && (

            {subtitle}

        )}
        {showDecoration && (

            ❈

        )}

  );
};

export default Header;


The components use React with TypeScript interface syntax, but .jsx extension suggests it's JavaScript with React, but using TypeScript-like interfaces? Actually, JSX files can have TypeScript syntax if the build supports it. But the file is .jsx, not .tsx. The interface might be just plain JS with Flow? Or it's actually just syntax that works with Babel and TypeScript preset.

Given the tailwind.config.js exists, this is a Tailwind CSS project. The color classes (tet-gold-400, etc.) suggest a custom color palette defined in tailwind.config.js.

Let me check the tailwind config.


/** @type {import('tailwindcss').Config} */
module.exports = {
  content: [
    "./components/**/*.{js,ts,jsx,tsx}",
  ],
  theme: {
    extend: {
      colors: {
        tet: {
          red: {
            50: '#fff5f5',
            100: '#ffe5e5',
            200: '#ffc7c7',
            300: '#ffa8a8',
            400: '#ff8989',
            500: '#ff6b6b',
            600: '#fa5252',
            700: '#f03e3e',
            800: '#e03131',
            900: '#c92a2a',
            950: '#a61e1e',
          },
          gold: {
            50: '#fffbeb',
            100: '#fff3cd',
            200: '#ffe69c',
            300: '#ffec99',
            400: '#ffe066',
            500: '#ffd43b',
            600: '#fcc419',
            700: '#fab005',
            800: '#f59f00',
            900: '#e67700',
            950: '#d9480f',
          },
          // Tet-specific colors
          lucky: '#ffcc00', // Lucky gold
          prosperity: '#cc0000', // Prosperity red
          spring: '#ff6b6b', // Spring red
          blossom: '#ffd700', // Golden blossom
        }
      },
      fontFamily: {
        display: ['Poppins', 'sans-serif'],
        body: ['Inter', 'sans-serif'],
      },
      animation: {
        'fall': 'fall 8s linear infinite',
        'sway': 'sway 6s ease-in-out infinite',
        'bloom': 'bloom 2s ease-out forwards',
        'spin-slow': 'spin 12s linear infinite',
      },
      keyframes: {
        fall: {
          '0%': { transform: 'translateY(-10vh) rotate(0deg)', opacity: '0' },
          '10%': { opacity: '1' },
          '90%': { opacity: '1' },
          '100%': { transform: 'translateY(110vh) rotate(720deg)', opacity: '0' },
        },
        sway: {
          '0%, 100%': { transform: 'translateX(-5px)' },
          '50%': { transform: 'translateX(5px)' },
        },
        bloom: {
          '0%': { transform: 'scale(0)', opacity: '0' },
          '50%': { transform: 'scale(1.2)' },
          '100%': { transform: 'scale(1)', opacity: '1' },
        },
      },
    },
  },
  plugins: [],
}


Ok, so we have a Tailwind config with custom colors and animations. The content array points to "./components/**/*.{js,ts,jsx,tsx}" - but relative to where? This config file is in designer's worktree. If we combine all worktrees into a single project, the tailwind.config.js should be at the root of the project, and the components folder should be at the root/components.

But currently components are only in designer's worktree. The researcher has content/data.json.

It seems like the team is developing a portfolio site with a "Tet" theme (Lucky Gold, Prosperity Red, etc. - Vietnamese Tet holiday theme). The avatar.jpeg in the repo root is probably the person's photo.

Given my task as tester is to "Testing & Build: npm install, npm run build, fix errors, write README with Vercel deployment", I think I need to:

1. Assemble the project structure in my worktree (or in the repo root?) Actually, each agent works in their own isolated worktree but they all share the same repo root. Wait, the worktree is an isolated clone of the repository at a specific branch. The idea is that each agent works on their own branch and later merges. But for testing, I need to have a working project. Perhaps I'm supposed to:
   - Create a package.json that fits the project
   - Possibly integrate the components from designer branch by merging or copying? But since each branch is isolated, I cannot directly access other branches' worktree files unless I commit them to their branches and then merge. However, my worktree is a separate branch; I could potentially fetch changes from other branches and merge them to get the full project, but that might cause conflicts.

Let's think about how ClawTeam is supposed to work. The coordinator likely assigned tasks: designer adds components, researcher adds content, developer writes main app code, animator adds animations, and tester tests/builds. Each agent works on their own branch. At the end, they'll merge all branches together.

So the project should be built incrementally. At this moment, designer has components, researcher has content, but developer hasn't added anything yet (empty). Maybe the next step after testing is for the developer to create the main app. But my task is testing & build - maybe I need to create a minimal working project structure that can incorporate these parts, run the build, and ensure it works.

Perhaps the intended workflow: I (tester) should create the foundational project structure (package.json, index.html, main app entry, etc.) that uses the components and content from other branches. But I need to be careful not to step on developer's toes. However, developer's branch is empty, so maybe developer hasn't started yet and the coordinator expects tester to set up the build system first.

Let's re-read the task: "Testing & Build: npm install, npm run build, fix errors, write README with Vercel deployment."

It says nothing about creating package.json. But if package.json doesn't exist, I can't run npm install. So I must deduce what to do.

Perhaps the project is actually a Vite + React + Tailwind project. Let me see if any of the READMEs give hints.


# Portfolio


Only "Portfolio". That's not helpful. Let me check researcher's README.


All READMEs are just "# Portfolio". Not helpful.

Let me check the content/data.json:


Nguyễn Ngọc Trí Vĩ

AI Engineer

Passionate about building intelligent systems that bridge the gap between AI and real-world business problems. Currently researching AI-assisted solutions at SmartGift Solution.

LinkedIn and Facebook URLs not provided or could not be scraped due to login restrictions.

Ho Chi Minh City University of Industry and Trade

🥈 2nd Place – Essential IT Products Competition (2024)

🏆 Clean Code Award – Finding Talents & Innovative IT (2022)

Python
C++
HTML/CSS
JavaScript
PineScript
n8n
Telegram Bots

Researched and implemented AI-assisted solutions to improve developer team performance

Explored technologies for business use cases, built POCs, and documented recommendations

Applied AI Researcher & Operations Associate

Built AI-assisted trading and operations automation systems

Developed POCs and recommended technologies for business use

Designed applied AI curricula, workshops, and n8n learning assets

Supported COO in workflow optimization and process standardization

Managed full production and business operations

Optimized sourcing, production, and inventory systems

Built pricing strategy and launched direct sales channels

Achieved strong customer retention (2.51 repeat purchases/customer)

Developed nozzle quality inspection system for Japanese factory

Integrated 3D vision system for Samsung LED measurement (±7% accuracy)

Built OCR system for package code recognition in industrial environments

Nozzle Quality Inspection System

AI-powered computer vision system for automated quality inspection in manufacturing, detecting defects with high precision.

Computer Vision
Python
OpenCV
TensorFlow

3D Vision for LED Measurement

Integrated 3D vision system for Samsung LED measurement achieving ±7% accuracy, enabling precise quality control.

OCR for Industrial Package Recognition

Optical Character Recognition system for package code recognition in challenging industrial environments.

AI-Assisted Trading System (POC)

Developed proof-of-concept AI system for automated trading and operations at Learning Chain Vietnam.

n8n Workflow Automation Assets

Created comprehensive learning assets and workflows for business process automation using n8n.

Vườn Đậu Business Operations

Built full-stack e-commerce and inventory management system for herbal soy milk brand, achieving 2.51 repeat purchases per customer.

E-commerce
Inventory
Business Operations

Extracted from Next.js portfolio source code at /home/node/.openclaw/workspace/projects/my-portfolio

Data gathered from local source files. LinkedIn and Facebook scraping not attempted due to lack of URLs and login restrictions. Avatar created as SVG with initials.


Excellent! So the portfolio is for "Nguyễn Ngọc Trí Vĩ", an AI Engineer. The data includes personal info, education, experience, projects, etc. The avatar field points to "/avatars/nguyenvangoctrivia.svg" but in the repository we have an avatar.jpeg. The metadata says: "Data gathered from local source files. Avatar created as SVG with initials." So perhaps the actual SVG is not present, but we have a JPEG.

Now I understand: This is a portfolio website for a person. The components from designer are the UI. The content from researcher provides the data. There should be a main React app that ties them together. That might be the developer's job, but developer branch is empty. Maybe developer hasn't committed anything yet.

As tester, my job is to "Testing & Build: npm install, npm run build, fix errors, write README with Vercel deployment." This suggests I need to create a working project that can actually be built.

Given that there are components and data, I should:

1. Create a proper project structure with package.json (likely Vite + React + Tailwind)
2. Create an entry point (index.html, main.jsx/tsx)
3. Set up Tailwind config at root
4. Move/adjust tailwind.config.js from designer to root (or create one that works for full project)
5. Include the components and content in the project
6. Write an App.jsx that uses these to render the portfolio
7. Ensure dependencies are installed and build succeeds
8. Write a comprehensive README with Vercel deployment steps

But wait: I'm operating in my isolated worktree (tester branch). I cannot modify other agents' branches directly. However, the final product will need to merge all branches. Perhaps my job is just to set up the build system and test that the components can be built together. I might need to temporarily bring the components and content into my worktree to create a complete project for testing.

Alternative interpretation: Maybe the developer branch is supposed to have the main app code but it's missing due to a failure. Could be that the coordinator made a mistake and didn't assign a developer to create the app. But the task explicitly says I'm tester. So my role is not to write the main app but to verify that the existing parts can be built.

But if there's no entry point, the build will fail. So maybe the developer did create files but didn't commit? Let me check the developer worktree more thoroughly - maybe there are hidden files? But we listed all files earlier and it was empty. Could be that the developer's files are in their branch but not checked out in the worktree? Actually, the worktree reflects the branch. If the developer hasn't made any commits, the branch is at the initial commit which had nothing. So it's empty.

Maybe the plan is that the tester creates the foundational app structure (package.json, index.html, main entry) to enable testing of the components. The description says "Testing & Build: npm install, npm run build, fix errors, write README with Vercel deployment." It doesn't say "create package.json". But maybe "npm install" implies a package.json exists. But it doesn't! So either I'm missing something or the project is in a different location.

Let's double-check: Is there a package.json anywhere in the entire repository? Search the repo root and all worktrees.

exec

find /home/node/.openclaw/workspace/projects/clawteam-portfolio -name "package.json" -o -name "vite.config.*" -o -name "webpack.config.*" -o -name "tsconfig.json" -o -name "index.html"


(no output)


No package.json, no config files, no index.html anywhere. So the project is a blank slate. The agents have contributed components and content but no app structure.

Given my task, I think the right approach is to create a complete, production-ready project structure in my worktree that:
- Uses Vite (fast, modern, good for React)
- React with JSX (since components are .jsx)
- Tailwind CSS (since there's tailwind.config.js from designer, though it may need adjustments)
- Incorporates the designer's components and researcher's content
- Creates a simple App.jsx that renders a portfolio using those components and data
- Ensures npm install and npm run build work
- Contains a README with Vercel deployment instructions

This seems like a comprehensive task, but it's what's required to "test & build". I'm essentially building the scaffold around the existing pieces to verify they work in a real build environment.

I should also commit my changes to my branch (tester) and mark the task as completed. Then send summary to coordinator.

Given the complexity, I should use the brainstorming skill first? Actually, I should check if there's any existing skill that says I must brainstorm before building. The skill list includes "brainstorming" that I MUST use before any creative work. The skill description: "Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code." My task is a multi-step task: testing & build, but also I'll be creating code (package.json, vite config, etc). That qualifies as creative work. So I should invoke the brainstorming skill first.

But wait, the instructions say: "You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior." Yes, creating a project structure with package.json, vite config, index.html, etc. is creative work. So I must use the brainstorming skill first.

Let me invoke the brainstorming skill. The skill file is at ~/.openclaw/skills/brainstorming/SKILL.md. I need to read it to understand the process.

But first, maybe I should note: I need to be careful because this is a multi-agent coordination scenario. The skill might tell me to consider coordination. But I'll follow the skill.

Let me load brainstorming skill.


---
name: brainstorming
description: "You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation."
---

# Brainstorming Ideas Into Designs

Help turn ideas into fully formed designs and specs through natural collaborative dialogue.

Start by understanding the current project context, then ask questions one at a time to refine the idea. Once you understand what you're building, present the design and get user approval.

<HARD-GATE>
Do NOT invoke any implementation skill, write any code, scaffold any project, or take any implementation action until you have presented a design and the user has approved it. This applies to EVERY project regardless of perceived simplicity.
</HARD-GATE>

## Anti-Pattern: "This Is Too Simple To Need A Design"

Every project goes through this process. A todo list, a single-function utility, a config change — all of them. "Simple" projects are where unexamined assumptions cause the most wasted work. The design can be short (a few sentences for truly simple projects), but you MUST present it and get approval.

## Checklist

You MUST create a task for each of these items and complete them in order:

1. **Explore project context** — check files, docs, recent commits
2. **Offer visual companion** (if topic will involve visual questions) — this is its own message, not combined with a clarifying question. See the Visual Companion section below.
3. **Ask clarifying questions** — one at a time, understand purpose/constraints/success criteria
4. **Propose 2-3 approaches** — with trade-offs and your recommendation
5. **Present design** — in sections scaled to their complexity, get user approval after each section
6. **Write design doc** — save to `docs/superpowers/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md` and commit
7. **Spec self-review** — quick inline check for placeholders, contradictions, ambiguity, scope (see below)
8. **User reviews written spec** — ask user to review the spec file before proceeding
9. **Transition to implementation** — invoke writing-plans skill to create implementation plan

## Process Flow

```dot
digraph brainstorming {
    "Explore project context" [shape=box];
    "Visual questions ahead?" [shape=diamond];
    "Offer Visual Companion\n(own message, no other content)" [shape=box];
    "Ask clarifying questions" [shape=box];
    "Propose 2-3 approaches" [shape=box];
    "Present design sections" [shape=box];
    "User approves design?" [shape=diamond];
    "Write design doc" [shape=box];
    "Spec self-review\n(fix inline)" [shape=box];
    "User reviews spec?" [shape=diamond];
    "Invoke writing-plans skill" [shape=doublecircle];

    "Explore project context" -> "Visual questions ahead?";
    "Visual questions ahead?" -> "Offer Visual Companion\n(own message, no other content)" [label="yes"];
    "Visual questions ahead?" -> "Ask clarifying questions" [label="no"];
    "Offer Visual Companion\n(own message, no other content)" -> "Ask clarifying questions";
    "Ask clarifying questions" -> "Propose 2-3 approaches";
    "Propose 2-3 approaches" -> "Present design sections";
    "Present design sections" -> "User approves design?";
    "User approves design?" -> "Present design sections" [label="no, revise"];
    "User approves design?" -> "Write design doc" [label="yes"];
    "Write design doc" -> "Spec self-review\n(fix inline)";
    "Spec self-review\n(fix inline)" -> "User reviews spec?";
    "User reviews spec?" -> "Write design doc" [label="changes requested"];
    "User reviews spec?" -> "Invoke writing-plans skill" [label="approved"];
}
```

**The terminal state is invoking writing-plans.** Do NOT invoke frontend-design, mcp-builder, or any other implementation skill. The ONLY skill you invoke after brainstorming is writing-plans.

## The Process

**Understanding the idea:**

- Check out the current project state first (files, docs, recent commits)
- Before asking detailed questions, assess scope: if the request describes multiple independent subsystems (e.g., "build a platform with chat, file storage, billing, and analytics"), flag this immediately. Don't spend questions refining details of a project that needs to be decomposed first.
- If the project is too large for a single spec, help the user decompose into sub-projects: what are the independent pieces, how do they relate, what order should they be built? Then brainstorm the first sub-project through the normal design flow. Each sub-project gets its own spec → plan → implementation cycle.
- For appropriately-scoped projects, ask questions one at a time to refine the idea
- Prefer multiple choice questions when possible, but open-ended is fine too
- Only one question per message - if a topic needs more exploration, break it into multiple questions
- Focus on understanding: purpose, constraints, success criteria

**Exploring approaches:**

- Propose 2-3 different approaches with trade-offs
- Present options conversationally with your recommendation and reasoning
- Lead with your recommended option and explain why

**Presenting the design:**

- Once you believe you understand what you're building, present the design
- Scale each section to its complexity: a few sentences if straightforward, up to 200-300 words if nuanced
- Ask after each section whether it looks right so far
- Cover: architecture, components, data flow, error handling, testing
- Be ready to go back and clarify if something doesn't make sense

**Design for isolation and clarity:**

- Break the system into smaller units that each have one clear purpose, communicate through well-defined interfaces, and can be understood and tested independently
- For each unit, you should be able to answer: what does it do, how do you use it, and what does it depend on?
- Can someone understand what a unit does without reading its internals? Can you change the internals without breaking consumers? If not, the boundaries need work.
- Smaller, well-bounded units are also easier for you to work with - you reason better about code you can hold in context at once, and your edits are more reliable when files are focused. When a file grows large, that's often a signal that it's doing too much.

**Working in existing codebases:**

- Explore the current structure before proposing changes. Follow existing patterns.
- Where existing code has problems that affect the work (e.g., a file that's grown too large, unclear boundaries, tangled responsibilities), include targeted improvements as part of the design - the way a good developer improves code they're working in.
- Don't propose unrelated refactoring. Stay focused on what serves the current goal.

## After the Design

**Documentation:**

- Write the validated design (spec) to `docs/superpowers/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md`
  - (User preferences for spec location override this default)
- Use elements-of-style:writing-clearly-and-concisely skill if available
- Commit the design document to git

**Spec Self-Review:**
After writing the spec document, look at it with fresh eyes:

1. **Placeholder scan:** Any "TBD", "TODO", incomplete sections, or vague requirements? Fix them.
2. **Internal consistency:** Do any sections contradict each other? Does the architecture match the feature descriptions?
3. **Scope check:** Is this focused enough for a single implementation plan, or does it need decomposition?
4. **Ambiguity check:** Could any requirement be interpreted two different ways? If so, pick one and make it explicit.

Fix any issues inline. No need to re-review — just fix and move on.

**User Review Gate:**
After the spec review loop passes, ask the user to review the written spec before proceeding:

> "Spec written and committed to `<path>`. Please review it and let me know if you want to make any changes before we start writing out the implementation plan."

Wait for the user's response. If they request changes, make them and re-run the spec review loop. Only proceed once the user approves.

**Implementation:**

- Invoke the writing-plans skill to create a detailed implementation plan
- Do NOT invoke any other skill. writing-plans is the next step.

## Key Principles

- **One question at a time** - Don't overwhelm with multiple questions
- **Multiple choice preferred** - Easier to answer than open-ended when possible
- **YAGNI ruthlessly** - Remove unnecessary features from all designs
- **Explore alternatives** - Always propose 2-3 approaches before settling
- **Incremental validation** - Present design, get approval before moving on
- **Be flexible** - Go back and clarify when something doesn't make sense

## Visual Companion

A browser-based companion for showing mockups, diagrams, and visual options during brainstorming. Available as a tool — not a mode. Accepting the companion means it's available for questions that benefit from visual treatment; it does NOT mean every question goes through the browser.

**Offering the companion:** When you anticipate that upcoming questions will involve visual content (mockups, layouts, diagrams), offer it once for consent:
> "Some of what we're working on might be easier to explain if I can show it to you in a web browser. I can put together mockups, diagrams, comparisons, and other visuals as we go. This feature is still new and can be token-intensive. Want to try it? (Requires opening a local URL)"

**This offer MUST be its own message.** Do not combine it with clarifying questions, context summaries, or any other content. The message should contain ONLY the offer above and nothing else. Wait for the user's response before continuing. If they decline, proceed with text-only brainstorming.

**Per-question decision:** Even after the user accepts, decide FOR EACH QUESTION whether to use the browser or the terminal. The test: **would the user understand this better by seeing it than reading it?**

- **Use the browser** for content that IS visual — mockups, wireframes, layout comparisons, architecture diagrams, side-by-side visual designs
- **Use the terminal** for content that is text — requirements questions, conceptual choices, tradeoff lists, A/B/C/D text options, scope decisions

A question about a UI topic is not automatically a visual question. "What does personality mean in this context?" is a conceptual question — use the terminal. "Which wizard layout works better?" is a visual question — use the browser.

If they agree to the companion, read the detailed guide before proceeding:
`skills/brainstorming/visual-companion.md`


Okay, so I must go through the brainstorming process before I start writing any code. The task is "Testing & Build: npm install, npm run build, fix errors, write README with Vercel deployment." This is a creative work because I'll be creating a project structure, config files, maybe the main App file if none exists, etc. So I need to brainstorm.

The process:
1. Explore project context (I already did that)
2. Offer visual companion? Since this involves UI components and layout, it might be beneficial to show mockups. But is it necessary? The skill says: "Would the user understand better by seeing it than reading it?" The user is the coordinator/leader who assigned this task. They probably just want a working build, not necessarily visual design decisions. But the brainstorming skill requires I offer it if visual questions are ahead. The design includes "present design sections" which might include architecture diagrams. I think I should offer it.
3. Ask clarifying questions one at a time.
4. Propose approaches.
5. Present design and get approval.
6. Write design doc to docs/superpowers/specs/...
7. Spec self-review.
8. User reviews spec.
9. Invoke writing-plans.

Given this is a test/build task in a multi-agent team, the main goal is to have a working build pipeline that integrates the existing components. So the main questions: what framework? Where to put files? How to structure the project? Should I merge other branches' content into my worktree, or just reference them? Since it's an isolated worktree, I cannot directly use files from other worktrees unless I copy them into my branch or use git merge. The safest is to copy the necessary files from other worktrees into my project structure for the build. But then those changes would be in my branch only, not in theirs. That might be okay for testing: I'm creating a test build that includes the contributed pieces. Then when the actual app is assembled (maybe by developer later), they'll merge all branches and have a complete project.

But the instruction: "Before marking a task completed, commit your changes in this repository with git." My worktree is a git repository. I can commit changes there. So I'll add files (package.json, vite.config.js, index.html, src/main.jsx, src/App.jsx, etc.) and also copy the designer's components and researcher's content into my src structure. That would be a complete project. I should also fix any errors that arise.

The README should include Vercel deployment instructions.

Let me start by offering visual companion and then ask clarifying questions to ensure I'm on the right track.

But before that, I need to create the docs/superpowers/specs directory if it doesn't exist, but I'll do that after design.

I'll start by offering the visual companion.

I need to go through the **brainstorming** process before implementing. Let's begin.

**Visual Companion Offer:**

Some of what we're working on (project structure, component integration, build pipeline) might be easier to explain with visual mockups and diagrams as we go. I can put together architecture sketches, file layout previews, and comparison views in your browser. This helps catch issues early. Want to try it? (Requires opening a local URL)