Files
AgentHub/plugins/ccam-workflows/skills/concurrency-report/SKILL.md
T
nntrivi2001 57dc91585d feat: Claude Code Monitor — lanes, pipelines and a merged workspace
Internal SmartGift build of a Claude Code monitoring dashboard.

Lanes: a durable unit of parallel agent work, one per working directory,
tracked across session restarts. Managed lanes are git worktrees the
dashboard provisions and can reset or remove behind a three-check destroy
guard and a counted preflight; adopted lanes are directories you already
own and are never destroyable.

Pipelines: a lane moves through pipeline stages. A stage the agent declares
with evidence renders green; a stage inferred from the tool-event stream
renders dashed amber and never counts as done. Detection is forward-only
within a 30-minute window, and never writes the declared stage.

Workspace: one page at /run with a lane grid, the selected lane's pipeline,
and a full Claude console behind a disclosure.
2026-07-30 14:39:03 +07:00

54 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
---
description: >
Report concurrency and parallelism for a session — how many agents ran in
parallel, concurrency-lane utilization, peak parallel width, and
serialization bottlenecks (sequential chains that could have run as parallel
lanes) — using the Agent Monitor workflow intelligence API. Use when checking
whether a multi-agent session used parallelism efficiently.
---
# Concurrency Report
Report on parallel execution for one Claude Code session: lanes, peak width, utilization, and where work serialized.
## Input
The user provides: **$ARGUMENTS**
A session ID. If empty, fetch `GET /api/sessions?limit=1` and report on the most recent session, stating which one.
## Data Sources
| Endpoint | Returns |
|----------|---------|
| `GET /api/workflows/{sessionId}` | The `concurrency` dataset (overlapping agent execution lanes with start/end timing) and the `complexity` dataset (numeric score from depth, breadth, and tool diversity) |
## Report Sections
### 1. Parallelism Summary
From `concurrency`: number of distinct lanes, peak parallel width (max agents running simultaneously), and total agents. Pair with the `complexity` score to judge whether the parallelism matched the work's size.
`Lanes: N · Peak parallel: M · Agents: K · Complexity: S`
### 2. Lane Timeline
A per-lane list of the agents that occupied each lane in order:
`Lane 1: explore (0–12s) → code-review (12–48s)`
`Lane 2: debugger (5–30s)`
Show overlapping windows so simultaneity is visible.
### 3. Utilization
| Lane | Busy time | Idle time | Utilization % |
|------|-----------|-----------|---------------|
Plus an overall utilization figure (busy lane-time / total lane-time).
### 4. Serialization Bottlenecks
Identify sequential chains where one agent waited on the previous despite no apparent dependency — candidates to run as parallel lanes. State the chain and the wall-clock time it cost. Only flag chains the `concurrency` timing data actually shows as sequential.
## Output
- Markdown tables for utilization; a fenced list for the lane timeline.
- Durations in human units (e.g. `48s`, `2m 10s`); percentages to whole numbers.
- Use ▲/▼ when comparing utilization against an even-distribution baseline.
- Cite only timing returned by the API; never invent lane overlaps or durations.
- If the session ran a single agent (no concurrency), say so plainly rather than inventing lanes.
- If the dashboard is unreachable, tell the user to start it with `npm start` from the repo root.