Files
Claude-Code-Monitor/plugins/ccam-insights/skills/session-compare/SKILL.md
T
nntrivi2001 57dc91585d feat: Claude Code Monitor — lanes, pipelines and a merged workspace
Internal SmartGift build of a Claude Code monitoring dashboard.

Lanes: a durable unit of parallel agent work, one per working directory,
tracked across session restarts. Managed lanes are git worktrees the
dashboard provisions and can reset or remove behind a three-check destroy
guard and a counted preflight; adopted lanes are directories you already
own and are never destroyable.

Pipelines: a lane moves through pipeline stages. A stage the agent declares
with evidence renders green; a stage inferred from the tool-event stream
renders dashed amber and never counts as done. Detection is forward-only
within a 30-minute window, and never writes the declared stage.

Workspace: one page at /run with a lane grid, the selected lane's pipeline,
and a full Claude console behind a disclosure.
2026-07-30 14:39:03 +07:00

90 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown

---
description: >
Compare two sessions side-by-side using Agent Monitor data — per-model
token usage (input/output/cache_read/cache_write + compaction baselines),
pricing engine cost breakdowns, workflow intelligence (complexity scores,
tool flow transitions, subagent effectiveness), session metadata
(thinking_blocks, turn_count, turn_duration_ms, usage_extras), and
full event timelines with all 10+ event types.
---
# Session Compare
Compare two Claude Code sessions side-by-side using Agent Monitor data.
## Input
The user provides: **$ARGUMENTS**
This may be:
- Two session IDs: "abc123 def456"
- "best vs worst" — compare highest and lowest productivity sessions
- "latest 2" — compare the two most recent sessions
- A session ID + "vs average" — compare one session against the baseline
## Procedure
1. **Identify sessions to compare**:
- If two IDs given: fetch both from `http://localhost:4820/api/sessions/{id}`
- If "best vs worst": fetch sessions, score by completion + cost efficiency, pick extremes
- If "latest 2": `GET /api/sessions?limit=2` (default sort: most recently updated first)
- If "vs average": fetch session + compute averages from last 50 sessions
2. **Gather detailed data** for each session:
- Session metadata: `GET /api/sessions/{id}`
- Events: `GET /api/events?session_id={id}`
- Agents: `GET /api/agents?session_id={id}`
- Cost: `GET /api/pricing/cost/{id}`
3. **Build comparison**:
### Overview Comparison
| Metric | Session A | Session B | Difference |
|--------|-----------|-----------|-----------|
| Status | completed | error | — |
| Model | sonnet-4 | sonnet-4 | same |
| Duration | 12m 34s | 45m 12s | +32m 38s |
| Total Cost | $0.0234 | $0.1456 | +522% |
| Events | 45 | 187 | +315% |
| Tools Used | 8 | 12 | +4 |
| Error Count | 0 | 7 | +7 |
| Agents | 2 | 5 | +3 |
### Token Comparison
| Token Type | Session A | Session B | Difference |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|
| Input | N | N | ±N% |
| Output | N | N | ±N% |
| Cache Read | N | N | ±N% |
| Cache Write | N | N | ±N% |
| Efficiency | N% | N% | ±N% |
### Tool Usage Comparison
- Tools unique to Session A
- Tools unique to Session B
- Shared tools with usage count comparison
- Error rate per tool in each session
### Timeline Comparison
- Side-by-side event timeline
- Where sessions diverged in approach
- Key decision points that led to different outcomes
### Agent Activity Comparison
- Agent counts and types
- Subagent strategy differences
- Agent success rates
4. **Analysis**:
- Why one session was more efficient/successful than the other
- Key decisions that made the difference
- Lessons to apply to future sessions
## Output Format
Present as a side-by-side comparison report with:
- Executive comparison summary (which session was "better" and why)
- Structured comparison tables with color-coded differences (green = better, red = worse)
- A "Lessons Learned" section with actionable takeaways
- Overall winner declaration with justification